Narrative
Credibility Index
Measure trust in sustainability reporting. Detect greenwashing risk.
Benchmark disclosure quality.
Introducing Message
Introducing Message
Introducing Message
Turn ESG language into a credibility score you can audit and compare.
See credibility at paragraph-level
NCI scores reports on the signals that actually make disclosures credible: transparency, coherence, alignment with frameworks, neutral tone, and evidence density. Instead of reading 200 pages, you get a structured credibility profile you can compare across companies and years.
See credibility at paragraph-level
NCI scores reports on the signals that actually make disclosures credible: transparency, coherence, alignment with frameworks, neutral tone, and evidence density. Instead of reading 200 pages, you get a structured credibility profile you can compare across companies and years.
See credibility at paragraph-level
NCI scores reports on the signals that actually make disclosures credible: transparency, coherence, alignment with frameworks, neutral tone, and evidence density. Instead of reading 200 pages, you get a structured credibility profile you can compare across companies and years.
Detect greenwashing risk without guessing intent
NCI flags credibility gaps using explainable language indicators. It helps identify where reporting is aspirational versus auditable.
Detect greenwashing risk without guessing intent
NCI flags credibility gaps using explainable language indicators. It helps identify where reporting is aspirational versus auditable.
Detect greenwashing risk without guessing intent
NCI flags credibility gaps using explainable language indicators. It helps identify where reporting is aspirational versus auditable.
Built for regulators, analysts, and sustainability teams
The index combines a clear scoring rubric with AI-assisted text analysis to support benchmarking, pre-assurance diagnostics, and research-grade evaluation of disclosure quality.
Built for regulators, analysts, and sustainability teams
The index combines a clear scoring rubric with AI-assisted text analysis to support benchmarking, pre-assurance diagnostics, and research-grade evaluation of disclosure quality.
Built for regulators, analysts, and sustainability teams
The index combines a clear scoring rubric with AI-assisted text analysis to support benchmarking, pre-assurance diagnostics, and research-grade evaluation of disclosure quality.
Use cases
Use cases
Use cases
Where NCI fits in a workflow
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
Greenwashing risk triage
Highlight paragraphs that rely heavily on hedging and broad commitments, so reviewers can prioritize where to add specificity or supporting evidence.
Benchmarking and comparative analysis
Create consistent credibility profiles that make it easier to compare how different companies (or the same company over time) communicate transparency, evidence, and alignment.
Audit, assurance, and research workflows
Support sampling and analysis by producing paragraph-level labels and indicators that can be reviewed, double-coded, and validated against other benchmarks.
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
Greenwashing risk triage
Highlight paragraphs that rely heavily on hedging and broad commitments, so reviewers can prioritize where to add specificity or supporting evidence.
Benchmarking and comparative analysis
Create consistent credibility profiles that make it easier to compare how different companies (or the same company over time) communicate transparency, evidence, and alignment.
Audit, assurance, and research workflows
Support sampling and analysis by producing paragraph-level labels and indicators that can be reviewed, double-coded, and validated against other benchmarks.
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
Greenwashing risk triage
Highlight paragraphs that rely heavily on hedging and broad commitments, so reviewers can prioritize where to add specificity or supporting evidence.
Benchmarking and comparative analysis
Create consistent credibility profiles that make it easier to compare how different companies (or the same company over time) communicate transparency, evidence, and alignment.
Audit, assurance, and research workflows
Support sampling and analysis by producing paragraph-level labels and indicators that can be reviewed, double-coded, and validated against other benchmarks.
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
Greenwashing risk triage
Highlight paragraphs that rely heavily on hedging and broad commitments, so reviewers can prioritize where to add specificity or supporting evidence.
Benchmarking and comparative analysis
Create consistent credibility profiles that make it easier to compare how different companies (or the same company over time) communicate transparency, evidence, and alignment.
Audit, assurance, and research workflows
Support sampling and analysis by producing paragraph-level labels and indicators that can be reviewed, double-coded, and validated against other benchmarks.
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Greenwashing risk
Comperative analysis
Audit, assurence and research
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Greenwashing risk
Comperative analysis
Audit, assurence and research
CSRD and ESRS readiness checks
Use NCI as a structured review lens to spot places where disclosures may need clearer scope, baselines, timeframes, or references to ESRS/GRI requirements.
How It Works
How It Works
How It Works
A practical tool for the accountability
1 – Extract report narrative
Turn the report into clean, paragraph-level text so narrative sections can be assessed consistently.
2 – Score
Apply a clear rubric across dimensions like transparency, coherence, alignment, tone, and evidence to generate paragraph scores.
3 – Summarize and evaluate
Aggregate scores into section and report-level outputs that make comparisons easier while keeping a link back to the underlying text.
1 – Call
Type or speak your request, a thought, a task, a question.
2 – Awaken
The assistant weaves the answer, shaping text or insight in seconds.
3 – Embrace
Take what appears — refine it, use it, and move forward with ease.
1 – Extract report narrative
Turn the report into clean, paragraph-level text so narrative sections can be assessed consistently.
2 – Score
Apply a clear rubric across dimensions like transparency, coherence, alignment, tone, and evidence to generate paragraph scores.
3 – Summarize and evaluate
Aggregate scores into section and report-level outputs that make comparisons easier while keeping a link back to the underlying text.
Benefits
Benefits
Benefits
Credibility signals that can be compared, questioned, and tracked over time
Makes narratives inspectable
Scores paragraphs against defined criteria, so strengths and gaps are tied to specific text, not a vague impression.
Makes narratives inspectable
Scores paragraphs against defined criteria, so strengths and gaps are tied to specific text, not a vague impression.
Makes narratives inspectable
Scores paragraphs against defined criteria, so strengths and gaps are tied to specific text, not a vague impression.
Supports consistency across reviewers
A shared rubric and repeatable indicators help different people assess disclosures using the same yardstick.
Supports consistency across reviewers
A shared rubric and repeatable indicators help different people assess disclosures using the same yardstick.
Supports consistency across reviewers
A shared rubric and repeatable indicators help different people assess disclosures using the same yardstick.
Reduces interpretation risk
Makes it easier to separate concrete, verifiable reporting from broad commitments by scoring specific signals.
Reduces interpretation risk
Makes it easier to separate concrete, verifiable reporting from broad commitments by scoring specific signals.
Reduces interpretation risk
Makes it easier to separate concrete, verifiable reporting from broad commitments by scoring specific signals.
Supports due diligence and engagement
Surfaces specific passages that may warrant follow-up questions, clarification, or requests for supporting documentation.
Supports due diligence and engagement
Surfaces specific passages that may warrant follow-up questions, clarification, or requests for supporting documentation.
Supports due diligence and engagement
Surfaces specific passages that may warrant follow-up questions, clarification, or requests for supporting documentation.
Fits alongside existing ESG ratings
Designed to complement performance indicators by focusing on communication quality and evidence structure, rather than replacing outcome-based measures.
Fits alongside existing ESG ratings
Designed to complement performance indicators by focusing on communication quality and evidence structure, rather than replacing outcome-based measures.
Fits alongside existing ESG ratings
Designed to complement performance indicators by focusing on communication quality and evidence structure, rather than replacing outcome-based measures.
Tracks disclosure shifts under regulation
Helps monitor whether narratives become more specific and evidence-linked as standards and assurance expectations evolve.
Tracks disclosure shifts under regulation
Helps monitor whether narratives become more specific and evidence-linked as standards and assurance expectations evolve.
Tracks disclosure shifts under regulation
Helps monitor whether narratives become more specific and evidence-linked as standards and assurance expectations evolve.
FAQ
FAQ
FAQ
Your questions, answered with clarity
What is the Narrative Credibility Index (NCI)?
What would be a “good” NCI score, and how should it be interpreted?
What do I submit for “Request scoring”?
What do I receive back?
How is this different from ESG ratings?
What stage is the project in?
What is the Narrative Credibility Index (NCI)?
What would be a “good” NCI score, and how should it be interpreted?
What do I submit for “Request scoring”?
What do I receive back?
How is this different from ESG ratings?
What stage is the project in?
What is the Narrative Credibility Index (NCI)?
What would be a “good” NCI score, and how should it be interpreted?
What do I submit for “Request scoring”?
What do I receive back?
How is this different from ESG ratings?
What stage is the project in?
Explore the framework through
a scoring run
Submit a public sustainability report and receive a paragraph-level credibility profile plus a short methods note. Prototype stage. Limited scoring slots.